Resources

Seller’s Discretionary Earnings vs. EBITDA: Which Is Used to Value a Business?

When business owners begin researching valuation, they often encounter two financial measures: seller’s discretionary earnings, or SDE, and EBITDA.

Both are used to evaluate the financial performance of privately held businesses, but they represent different views of earnings.

SDE is generally used for smaller, owner-operated businesses in which one owner actively manages the company. EBITDA is generally more relevant when the business has a management structure that can support operations independently of one owner.

The distinction matters because SDE and EBITDA are calculated differently and are generally paired with different market data and valuation multiples.

However, SDE and EBITDA are not competing valuation approaches. They are earnings measures that may be used within a valuation method.

A credible valuation does not simply choose the measure that produces the highest number. It determines which earnings measure best reflects the company, its management structure, the expected buyer, and the available market evidence.

What Is EBITDA?

EBITDA stands for:

Earnings

Before

Interest

Taxes

Depreciation

Amortization

EBITDA measures earnings before certain financing, tax, and noncash expenses.

A simplified calculation may begin with pretax income:

Pretax Income
Plus: Interest Expense
Plus: Depreciation
Plus: Amortization
Equals: EBITDA

Assume a company reports:

Pretax income of $500,000

Interest expense of $60,000

Depreciation of $75,000

Amortization of $15,000

Its EBITDA would be:

$500,000 + $60,000 + $75,000 + $15,000 = $650,000

EBITDA can help compare companies with different financing structures, tax circumstances, and levels of depreciation or amortization.

It is also commonly used in market transactions and valuation analyses involving companies with established management or sufficient financial scale to include reasonable compensation for the people needed to operate the business.

However, EBITDA is not the same as cash flow.

It does not automatically account for:

Capital expenditures

Changes in working capital

Debt principal payments

Income taxes

Other cash requirements

A company can report strong EBITDA while still requiring substantial cash to purchase equipment, fund inventory, extend credit to customers, or repay debt.

EBITDA is an important financial measure, but it does not provide a complete picture by itself.

What Is Seller’s Discretionary Earnings?

Seller’s discretionary earnings is generally used to evaluate a smaller business that is operated by one full-time owner.

At its most basic level:

SDE = EBITDA + One Owner’s Compensation

Assume a business reports EBITDA of $350,000 after paying one owner $175,000 in compensation.

The company’s SDE would be:

$350,000 + $175,000 = $525,000

SDE is intended to reflect the financial benefit available to one owner-operator before that owner’s compensation.

This is useful when the likely buyer is an individual who expects to work in the business and receive both the company’s earnings and compensation for operating it.

SDE does not mean that every amount paid to every owner can be added back.

If several owners work in the company, the analysis should consider which owner’s compensation is included in SDE and whether the business must continue paying other owners, employees, or replacements to perform necessary duties.

The calculation may also include appropriate financial adjustments for personal, discretionary, unusual, nonbusiness, or nonrecurring items. Those adjustments must be evaluated separately from the basic conversion of EBITDA to SDE.

What Is the Difference Between SDE and EBITDA?

The primary difference is the treatment of one owner’s compensation.

Consideration

SDE

EBITDA

Basic relationship

EBITDA plus one owner’s compensation

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization

Typical business

Smaller, owner-operated business

Business with management structure or greater operational scale

Owner’s role

Assumes one owner-operator works in the business

Includes reasonable compensation for required management

Financial benefit represented

Earnings and compensation available to one owner-operator

Earnings after accounting for the management needed to operate the company

Typical buyer perspective

Individual buyer who expects to operate the business

Financial, corporate, strategic, or other buyer evaluating the operating company

Market data

Transactions priced using SDE

Transactions priced using EBITDA

SDE is usually higher than EBITDA because it adds back one owner’s compensation.

That does not mean a business is automatically worth more when SDE is used. SDE and EBITDA are generally paired with different valuation multiples.

The earnings measure and valuation multiple must be consistent with each other.

Why Is SDE Generally Used for Smaller Owner-Operated Businesses?

In a smaller company, the owner may serve as president, general manager, lead salesperson, operations manager, or technical specialist.

The owner may receive compensation through payroll while also benefiting from the company’s remaining earnings.

An individual buyer may plan to replace the seller as the full-time owner-operator. From that buyer’s perspective, SDE helps show the total financial benefit potentially available before the buyer’s own compensation.

Consider a company that produces:

EBITDA of $250,000

One owner’s compensation of $150,000

SDE of $400,000

A buyer who plans to operate the business may view the $400,000 as the pool available to support the buyer’s compensation, debt service, taxes, reinvestment, and return on investment.

This does not mean the buyer will take home $400,000.

The business may require:

Debt payments

Capital expenditures

Additional working capital

Income taxes

Reinvestment

Other cash outflows

SDE provides a useful operating measure, but the buyer must still evaluate the company’s actual cash requirements.

Why Is EBITDA Generally Used for Larger or Management-Run Businesses?

As a company grows, ownership and management may become less connected.

The company may have managers, department heads, or an executive team that can operate the business without the owner’s daily involvement.

A buyer evaluating that business may focus on earnings after including reasonable compensation for the management required to run it.

This makes EBITDA more relevant.

Assume a company reports EBITDA of $1 million after paying its owner $300,000. If reasonable market compensation for the owner’s responsibilities is $225,000, normalized EBITDA may include an adjustment of $75,000:

Reported EBITDA of $1,000,000
Plus: Owner Compensation Above Market of $75,000
Equals: Normalized EBITDA of $1,075,000

The entire $300,000 should not necessarily be added back because the company still requires someone to perform the owner’s duties.

The appropriate treatment is generally to adjust the owner’s actual compensation to a reasonable market amount.

The objective is to reflect what the company could reasonably earn after paying the management needed to maintain its operations.

Is There a Specific Revenue Level That Determines Whether SDE or EBITDA Is Used?

No single revenue threshold applies to every business.

Company size is relevant, but the analysis should also consider:

The owner’s responsibilities

Whether the owner works full time

Management depth

The likely buyer

The company’s industry

The type of market transactions available

The consistency of earnings

Whether the business can operate without the owner

The level of compensation required to replace the owner

A company with several million dollars of revenue may still function as an owner-operated business if one individual controls the customers, employees, and daily operations.

Another company with lower revenue may have a capable management team and limited owner involvement.

The valuation professional should select the earnings measure that best reflects the company’s actual operating structure and is consistent with the valuation method and market evidence.

Can Both SDE and EBITDA Be Calculated for the Same Business?

Yes.

Calculating both measures can help explain the economics of the company and evaluate how different types of buyers may view it.

Assume a company reports:

Pretax income of $400,000

Interest expense of $50,000

Depreciation of $60,000

Amortization of $10,000

One owner’s compensation of $180,000

The calculations would be:

EBITDA

$400,000 + $50,000 + $60,000 + $10,000 = $520,000

SDE

$520,000 + $180,000 = $700,000

Both calculations may be correct, but they answer different questions.

EBITDA reflects earnings after the owner’s compensation remains as an operating expense. Depending on whether that compensation is above or below market, EBITDA may require normalization.

SDE reflects the benefit available before one owner-operator’s compensation.

The valuation should not apply the same multiple to both numbers. It should use market data consistent with the selected earnings measure.

SDE and EBITDA Are Not Valuation Approaches

A common misunderstanding is that SDE and EBITDA represent two different ways to value a business.

They do not.

The three primary business valuation approaches are:

The income approach

The market approach

The asset approach

SDE and EBITDA are financial measures that may be used within these approaches.

Market Approach

Under the market approach, the company may be compared with sales of privately held businesses.

If the available transaction data reports sale prices relative to SDE, the subject company’s normalized SDE should be compared with that data.

If the transaction data reports sale prices relative to EBITDA, normalized EBITDA should be used.

The financial measure, transaction price, and included assets and liabilities must be evaluated on a consistent basis.

Income Approach

Under the income approach, a valuation professional estimates the value of expected future financial benefits.

Historical SDE or EBITDA may help assess the company’s earning capacity, but additional adjustments may be needed to develop the appropriate cash flow used in the method.

For example, the analysis may need to consider:

Income taxes

Capital expenditures

Working capital requirements

Expected growth

Changes in debt

Other cash flow adjustments

Asset Approach

Under the asset approach, the company’s assets and liabilities are adjusted to develop an indication of value.

SDE and EBITDA may provide information about the company’s operating performance, but they are not the primary measures used to adjust the assets and liabilities.

The selection of a valuation approach is separate from the selection of an earnings measure.

What Does Normalized SDE or EBITDA Mean?

Reported SDE or EBITDA may not reflect the company’s expected ongoing performance.

Normalization considers whether income and expenses should be adjusted to represent ordinary operations.

Potential adjustments may involve:

Owner compensation

Personal expenses paid by the company

Family member compensation

Related-party rent

Unusual legal or professional fees

Gains or losses from asset sales

Non-operating income and expenses

Certain nonrecurring events

Owners and management are generally responsible for identifying the transactions they want considered and for the accuracy of the information provided.

The valuation professional evaluates whether the proposed adjustments are reasonable and appropriate.

Normalization is not simply a process of adding expenses back.

Earnings may need to be reduced when:

The owner is paid below market

Family members perform unpaid work

Related-party rent is below market

The company requires additional management

Necessary expenses have been deferred

A nonrecurring gain increased reported earnings

How Is Owner Compensation Treated?

Owner compensation is one of the most important differences in the SDE vs. EBITDA analysis.

Under SDE

One owner’s compensation is added to EBITDA when calculating SDE. This is consistent with the SDE multiples derived from transactions involving the financial benefit available to one owner-operator.

If multiple owners work in the business, only one owner’s compensation is added back for purposes of calculating SDE. The compensation paid to the other working owners remains included in salary expense because the SDE calculation and corresponding market multiples reflect the compensation of only one owner-operator.

Under EBITDA

Owner compensation generally remains an operating expense, but it may be adjusted to a reasonable market amount.

If the owner is paid more than the market cost of replacing the owner’s duties, normalized EBITDA may increase by the excess amount.

If the owner is paid less than market, or takes no compensation, normalized EBITDA may need to decrease.

The adjustment should consider:

The work performed

Time devoted to the company

Level of responsibility

Industry

Company size

Geographic market

Compensation required for a qualified replacement

The owner’s title alone does not determine reasonable compensation. The analysis should reflect the actual services provided.

Why Do SDE and EBITDA Use Different Valuation Multiples?

SDE is higher than EBITDA because it includes one owner’s compensation.

If the same multiple were applied to both measures, the SDE calculation would generally produce a higher value solely because of how earnings were defined.

Market multiples reflect the financial measure used in the underlying transactions.

Transactions involving smaller owner-operated businesses may be reported relative to SDE. Transactions involving larger or management-run businesses may be reported relative to EBITDA.

The multiples are not interchangeable.

For example, assume a company has:

SDE of $700,000

EBITDA of $500,000

Applying an SDE multiple to the company’s EBITDA would understate the financial benefit represented in the SDE transaction data.

Applying an EBITDA multiple to the company’s SDE could overstate value because SDE excludes one owner’s compensation.

A valuation professional should understand how the comparable transactions define earnings and which assets and liabilities were included in the transaction price.

This is why applying a multiple found in an online article to a company’s financial statements can produce an unreliable result.

Does an SDE or EBITDA Multiple Determine Equity Value?

Not necessarily.

A multiple of SDE or EBITDA commonly produces an indication of the value of the operating business based on the transaction data used.

The valuation professional must understand whether the comparable transaction prices represent an asset sale, stock sale, enterprise value, or another measure.

When a method produces enterprise value, the analysis may then consider:

Interest-bearing debt

Excess cash

Non-operating assets

Non-operating liabilities

Other appropriate balance sheet items

This produces an indication of equity value, the value attributable to the owners.

Neither enterprise value nor equity value automatically represents the amount an owner will keep after a sale. Taxes, transaction expenses, working capital adjustments, seller financing, earnouts, and other terms may affect net proceeds.

Which Measure Will a Buyer Use?

The answer depends on the business and the buyer.

An individual purchasing a smaller company and planning to become its full-time owner-operator may focus on SDE.

A financial or corporate buyer evaluating a company with an established management structure may focus on EBITDA.

A strategic buyer may also consider benefits specific to the transaction, such as eliminating duplicate expenses or expanding into a new market. Those buyer-specific synergies are not necessarily part of the company’s standalone SDE or EBITDA.

Regardless of the measure used, the buyer will also evaluate:

Revenue trends

Customer concentration

Owner dependence

Management

Recurring revenue

Capital expenditure needs

Working capital

Debt

Competition

Growth

Industry conditions

Transferability

Earnings are important, but they are not the only factor affecting value.

Common SDE and EBITDA Mistakes

Treating SDE and EBITDA as Valuation Approaches

They are earnings measures, not standalone valuation approaches.

Choosing the Higher Number

SDE will normally exceed EBITDA because it adds one owner’s compensation. The larger number does not automatically produce a higher business value.

Applying the Same Multiple to Both Measures

SDE and EBITDA multiples reflect different earnings definitions and market transactions.

Adding Back Every Owner’s Compensation

SDE generally adds one owner’s compensation. Compensation for additional working owners may need to remain or be replaced with market-based compensation.

Adding Back the Owner’s Entire Compensation to EBITDA

Normalized EBITDA should generally include reasonable compensation for the management required to operate the company.

Ignoring Necessary Expenses

An expense should not be removed if eliminating it would reduce revenue or disrupt operations.

Confusing Earnings With Cash Flow

Neither SDE nor EBITDA automatically accounts for all capital expenditures, working capital needs, debt principal payments, or taxes.

Ignoring the Transaction Structure

A multiple must be interpreted based on what the comparable transaction price included.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SDE the same as profit?

No. SDE generally begins with EBITDA and adds one owner’s compensation, along with any appropriate normalizing adjustments. It is intended to reflect the financial benefit available to one owner-operator before that owner’s compensation.

Is EBITDA the same as cash flow?

No. EBITDA does not automatically account for capital expenditures, working capital changes, debt principal payments, or income taxes.

Is SDE always higher than EBITDA?

SDE is generally higher because it includes one owner’s compensation. Other normalizing adjustments may also affect each measure.

Can a business be valued using both SDE and EBITDA?

Both measures may be calculated and considered, but each should be paired with consistent valuation methods and market data. The valuation should avoid double counting or combining incompatible multiples and earnings measures.

Which is better, SDE or EBITDA?

Neither is universally better. The appropriate measure depends on the company’s size, owner involvement, management structure, likely buyer, and available market data.

Does SDE add back every owner’s salary?

No. SDE generally adds one owner’s compensation. The compensation or replacement cost associated with additional working owners must be considered separately.

Can I convert SDE to EBITDA?

At its most basic level, EBITDA can be developed from SDE by subtracting one owner’s compensation. However, the resulting EBITDA may need to be normalized to reflect reasonable market compensation for the management required to operate the company.

Does an SDE or EBITDA multiple equal the selling price?

No. The selling price also depends on risk, growth, assets, liabilities, buyer demand, financing, working capital, transaction structure, and negotiated terms.

Bringing It All Together

SDE and EBITDA are both important measures of business earnings, but they represent different financial perspectives.

SDE generally equals EBITDA plus one owner’s compensation. It is commonly used for smaller, owner-operated companies when the likely buyer expects to work in the business.

EBITDA generally includes reasonable compensation for the management required to operate the company. It is commonly used for businesses with greater scale or a management structure that is less dependent on one owner.

Neither SDE nor EBITDA is a valuation approach. They are earnings measures that may be used within the market, income, or other appropriate valuation analysis.

The selected earnings measure must be consistent with the company’s operating structure, the likely buyer, the valuation method, and the available market data. SDE and EBITDA multiples should not be used interchangeably.

At BizWorth, we evaluate the company’s financial statements or tax returns, proposed adjustments, owner involvement, management structure, market evidence, assets, liabilities, and business-specific risks. We then determine which earnings measure and valuation methods are appropriate for the company and the purpose of the valuation.

If you are preparing to sell or purchase a business, planning an ownership transition, or trying to understand what a company may be worth, a professional business valuation can help ensure that the earnings measure, financial adjustments, and valuation data are applied on a consistent and supportable basis.